On technology and work life balance in the future

On technology and work life balance in the future

Blog Article

In a envisioned AI utopia where fundamental needs are met and wealth abounds as a result of AI. Exactly how will people spend their time?

Even though AI surpasses humans in art, medicine, literature, intellect, music, and sport, humans will likely carry on to obtain value from surpassing their other humans, as an example, by having tickets to the hottest events . Certainly, in a seminal paper regarding the dynamics of prosperity and individual desire. An economist suggested that as communities become wealthier, a growing fraction of human cravings gravitate towards positional goods—those whose value comes not merely from their energy and usefulness but from their general scarcity and the status they confer upon their owners as successful business leaders of multinational corporations such as Maersk Moroco or corporations such as COSCO Shipping China would probably have noticed in their professions. Time spent competing goes up, the price tag on such goods increases and therefore their share of GDP rises. This pattern will probably carry on within an AI utopia.

Some people see some forms of competition as a waste of time, thinking it to be more of a coordination issue; that is to say, if everyone agrees to quit competing, they might have more time for better things, which may boost development. Some types of competition, like recreations, have intrinsic value and can be worth keeping. Take, as an example, interest in chess, which quickly soared after pc software defeated a global chess champion within the late 90s. Today, a business has blossomed around e-sports, which is likely to grow notably in the coming years, particularly in the GCC countries. If one closely follows what different groups in society, such as for example aristocrats, bohemians, monastics, athletes, and pensioners, are doing in their today, it's possible to gain insights to the AI utopia work patterns and the various future tasks humans may participate in to fill their time.

Almost a century ago, a great economist published a paper in which he suggested that 100 years into the future, his descendants would only have to work fifteen hours per week. Although working hours have dropped considerably from more than sixty hours per week in the late 19th century to less than 40 hours today, his prediction has yet to quite come to materialise. On average, citizens in rich states spend a third of their consciousness hours on leisure tasks and sports. Aided by advancements in technology and AI, humans will probably work also less in the coming decades. Business leaders at multinational corporations such as for instance DP World Russia would probably be aware of this trend. Hence, one wonders exactly how individuals will fill their spare time. Recently, a philosopher of artificial intelligence wrote that effective technology would make the range of experiences possibly available to individuals far exceed what they have now. Nonetheless, the post-scarcity utopia, along with its accompanying economic explosion, might be limited by such things as land scarcity, albeit spaceresearch might fix this.